So what, exactly, defines something as being graphic enough for a warning? Does it have to be sexual? Violent?

I say this because I saw a photo on DA today of a rotting cat's corpse. It looked recently deceased, almost as if it had burned in a fire, and the photographer had portrayed it humorously. Needless to say I thought he was a psychopath who had burned the poor thing in his backyard! There was no warning on it or anything, and let me say it just wasn't something I wanted to see. It wasn't tasteful, or poetic. Frankly it wasn't art. It was just a guy, posting a picture of a cat that had died and giving the poor thing no respect.

Maybe I've gone soft, but if my eleven year old sister came across that then I know that she'd have nightmares. And there are kids on here younger than eleven.

Just saying, put a warning on it if you're going to put up something like that. Also, you're a sick motherfucker for thinking other people would want to see it.